>So perhaps the refcnt should have been a long in the first place. A >similar argument may hold for the length of e.g. strings and lists: >one could wish to have a list of more than 2 billion elements, or a >string containing more than 2 gigabytes (that much RAM is easily found >on the larger 64-bit servers, I believe). > >Opinions? If you change to longs it seems the reported performance increase goes away, which would seem to eliminate one of the motivations for accepting the pain of a binary incompatibility. Leaving just "getting it right". Mats
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4