On 6 Sep 2002, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >A number of systems provide subsecond time stamp resolution for >files. In particular: > >- NFS v3 has nanosecond time stamps. > >- Solaris 9 has nanosecond time stamps in stat(2), and microsecond > time stamps in utimes(2). In addition, they have microsecond time > stamps on ufs. It appears that other Unices have also extended > stat(2), as does OS X. > >- NTFS has 100ns resolution for time stamps. (---) >C. Make st_mtime a floating point number. This won't offer nanosecond > resolution, as C doubles are not dense enough. This seems to me the most Pythonic way. Are C doubles dense enough to offer 100 ns resolution ? /Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4