> > [RH] > > > > How about adding some mixins to simplify the > > > > implementation of some of the fatter interfaces? [GvR] > On second thought, I don't think there's enough here to warrant > putting this in the standard library. E.g. the example from BaseSet > actually strikes me as indirect: because <= is the natural operation > to provide for sets, hanging everything off __lt__ looks forced. Agreed. How about the MappingMixin and SequenceMixin? These both provide much more meat and have more natural attach points (getitem, setitem, delitem).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4