Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes: > > Any objections against committing the patch? > > What do MvL and MAL say? I'm still concerned about the massive amounts of C code, most of which could be expressed way more compact in Python code. Walter convinced me that this (the aspect that I picked in a discussion) does have a real performance impact for real data, so I guess I have to live with that. Because of the size, I'm sure there are still bugs in it. I couldn't spot any by inspection, so I think the patch is ready to be installed. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4