barry@python.org (Barry A. Warsaw) writes: > I'm not sure we'd want to distribute either the source or binary > though. They're fairly large. If we did, I'd recommend BerkeleyDB > 4.0.14, not the latest version, because bsddb3 doesn't yet build on > 4.1.24 because of some incompatible API changes, IIUC. libdb33.dll is 470k, which might be acceptable. I agree that distributing the source is pointless. > Martin, what do you plan to do about the pybsddb test suite? I would ignore it, or put it in non-dist (in case this indicates the end of the pybsddb project). > Maybe we include none of that, but simply "import" the code into > Python and re-sync whenever it's appropriate. That is my proposal. Initially, there would be no user-visible change, as it would operate in compatible mode. We could then incorporate more documentation as we go along. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4