A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029789.html below:

[Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3

[Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3 [Python-Dev] Incorporating bsddb3Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:38:54 -0500
> I have changes in my sandbox to incorporate bsddb3 into Python
> proper. This essentially is a copy of bsddb3 3.4.0, with the following
> modifications:
> - the extension module is called _bsddb (not bsddb3._db)
> - the package is called bsddb (not bsddb3)
> 
> Both test_bsddb and test_anydbm continue to work unmodified.

What happens if you don't have the software installed to make this
work, but you do have what it takes to make the *old* bsddb module
work?  I presume that one bites the dust now?

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4