Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Christian Tismer wrote:
>
>>Stackless is changing heavily, once again.
>
>
> Good news. It might be worth pointing out that even if continuations are
> not directly supported, it should be possible to do them with thread
> pickling. Unpickling a given thread state several times does the trick.
This is correct.
Actually, re-enabling continuations would not be *that*
problem. What it needs it a copy-on-write like wrapper
around frames, to make them duplicate when necessary.
But I really don't want to go this path again,
last but not least to avoid giving Guido an argument :-)
a man cannot step into the same river twice -- chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4