> [Tim] > > ... > > I *like* your suggestion to skip this unless there's an embedded > > space, I just seem unable to do anything about it now (but it would > > still be for 2.3 -- mucking with 2.2 is too dangerous). > > [Thomas Heller] > > I did a quick check: the online pdf file does say exactly the same > > as the online help (which is still in windows help format). > > It pops up when youu press F1 in this dialog. If even this does not > > work on win 98 <wink>, I can post the text here. > > Better, if this interests you, how about you submit a (tested) patch that > skips the convert-to-short business unless there's an embedded space? This > isn't going to become a priority for me -- it's a "doctor! doctor!" thing. > That is, the installer suggests a path that isn't going to confuse anyone, > no way, no how. When someone insists on making life more difficult, my > capacity for empathic outrage is limited <wink>; top-level directories > haven't been a limited critical resource since FAT faded away. > No, it doesn't interest me. I'm not going to install python (which I often use from the command line) ever into a deep subpath, or one containing spaces. Even my python 1.5.2 lives in c:\Python1.5. I just wanted to remind you on the online (F1) help, which is real good IMO in wise. Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4