>>>>> "JJ" == Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> writes:
>> Re-reading this, are you saying that this failure is on MacOS9
>> only?
JJ> Correct. Or, to be hyper-correct: it fails in MacPython 2.2.X
JJ> on OSX as well, but not in unix-Python 2.2.X on OSX.
Ok, cool. I'm of course only testing unix-Python on OSX.
>> That test passes just fine on OSX 10.2 and the data looks just
>> fine to me, so this must be an OS9 failure only.
>> Maybe the thing to do is to open msg_26.txt in binary mode, but
>> only on MacOS9?
JJ> Doesn't work, now the assert just above that fails (the
JJ> payload length is 0 in stead of 2), so I think this breaks the
JJ> boundary separation or somesuch. I've added code to simply
JJ> skip this test for MacPython 2.2.X, how do you feel about
JJ> that?
I'm happy with that for Python 2.2.2, since I'm convinced it's just a
problem with the test suite. When we have more breathing room
(i.e. Python 2.3) we can see if we can come up with something more
useful.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4