> I thought this was only a 2.3 thing. But this thread started with you reporting a 2.2.2 problem trying to compile SSL! > I just tried on the release22_maint CVS branch. The bsddb module > compiled and linked fine, but I don't know why. Oh, wait a > minute... The release22_maint branch doesn't have the bsddb bells > and whistles I added to setup.py a couple months ago. Consequently, > it's picking up the 1.85 version of the include file and library > (which, I will remind people has known breakage). > > Should I backport those changes? I think what's in 2.3's setup.py > is much more robust, but if people have been getting Berkeley DB > 1.85 libraries in 2.2.1 and don't get a clean compile in 2.2.2 > without editing setup.py because 1.85 is all they have available, > that might be construed as "more than a bugfix". > > Let me know what you want to do in this regard Guido. I think it's too precarious to fix in 2.2.2. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4