Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029375.html below:

PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

    David> 2r/3 would be nicer IMO.

I like this the best of those I've seen so far.  I don't see any reason that
rational literals need to contain a division symbol, so "2r" makes a fine
rational.  What about "2.5r"?  Can that just be expanded to "25r/10" by the
lexical analyzer?

Skip

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4