Paul Hughett wrote: > Greg Ewing wrote: > > >>So, I'm now reduced to suggesting > > >> <2/3> > > > How about 2r3, which could be pronounced "2 rational 3" and is syntactically > very similar to the universal 2e3? What's so hard about rat(2,3) ? And if that doesn't look right, simply do: R = rat(1,1) 2/R/3 This works without any changes to the language. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH _______________________________________________________________________ eGenix.com -- Makers of the Python mx Extensions: mxDateTime,mxODBC,... Python Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4