Greg Ewing <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> writes:
> Andrew> In that case, wouldn't you have a situation where a==b, a and
> Andrew> b are the same type, but x[a]!=x[b]?
>
> Yes. Not such a good idea, I suppose.
>
> I've just had another idea:
>
> {2/3}
2r/3 would be nicer IMO.
--
David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave@boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4