Andrew> In that case, wouldn't you have a situation where a==b, a and
Andrew> b are the same type, but x[a]!=x[b]?
Yes. Not such a good idea, I suppose.
I've just had another idea:
{2/3}
This can't be confused with a dict, because there's
no ":" in it.
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4