Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029160.html below:

[Python-Dev] the not operator (and the __not__ special method)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] the not operator (and the __not__ special method)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] the not operator (and the __not__ special method)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 07:22:15PM -0400, Aahz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002, Brian Quinlan wrote:
> >
> > > shows that python doesn't call the __not__ special method
> > > in a 'not' operator statement.
> > 
> > Python calls the special __nonzero__ method so check the truth value of
> > an object.
> 
> Mark McEahern provided the full answer: Python uses __len__, too.

This reminds me of an asymmetry between the bool type and other built-in
types: the lack of a __bool__ method.

Perhaps a __bool__ method should be added to objects, just like __int__,
__str__, __long__, __float__, __complex__ and __unicode__.

If __bool__ is not defined bool() would fall back to using __nonzero__ 
and __len__, just like str() falls back to using __repr__ when __str__ is 
not defined.

Would this be done in CPython with a new tp_bool slot or special-cased
like __unicode__ and __complex__?  Binary compatibility aside, I think it 
should be a slot.  Boolean evaluation is a pretty basic operation.

	Oren

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] the not operator (and the __not__ special method)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] the not operator (and the __not__ special method)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4