RetroSearch Browse

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029110.html below:

PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issuesGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:36:08 -0400

Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Note that I started to work on mxNumber to get a feeling for
> how well rationals et al. fit the existing world. Turns out
> that having separate types is a goo[d] thing.

Any mxNumber users out there who have experience with mxRational?

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4