> After releasing the GetPot 1.0 Version I did some research on other > packages and I found the the Option Parsing RFC. What's the Option Parsing RFC? > I totally missed the discussion. How come that nobody contacted me > about the GetPot package ? Because we didn't know you existed? > To get a python doc out should not be a problem at all. Not one single > person, though, complained until now, since the C++ doc is totally > equivalent. > > Take a look at http://getpot.sourceforge.net for new features of the > 1.0 Version. Except for the automated documenting feature (which may > be a little intrusive in its format) I don't really see what Optik > brings new on the table. > > Guys, even though GetPot is designed for many languages, I'd like > to join the command line parsing discussion. Too late. We've settled on Optik (under a different name). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4