Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes:
> [Andrew Koenig]
> > Much as I like APL, I'd rather use Scheme's numeric model.
>
> I've heard that before, but I've also heard criticism of Scheme's
> numeric model. "It works in Scheme" doesn't give me the warm fuzzy
> feeling that it's been tried in real life.
Could try aping Common Lisp. It's much more tightly specified, and
actually has had some exposure to the real world.
Here would seem to be a start:
http://www.lispworks.com/reference/HyperSpec/Body/12_ac.htm
Cheers,
M.
--
how am I expected to quit smoking if I have to deal with NT
every day -- Ben Raia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4