A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-October/029082.html below:

PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issues [Python-Dev] Re: PEP239 (Rational Numbers) Reference Implementation and new issuesRaymond Hettinger python@rcn.com
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:13:16 -0400
From: "Greg Ewing" <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>
> > The HP32SII calculator implements a useful rational model using
> > flags and a maximum denominator register.  If the first flag is clear,
> > fractions are have denominators upto the maximum value.  If only
> > the first flag is set, fractions always use the maximum denominator
> > as the denominator and are then reduced (i.e. if the max is 8, then
> > .5 is represented as 1/2 and .1 is represented as 1/8).
> 
> I can see that being useful when you're doing calculations
> with, e.g. measurements in 64ths of an inch and you don't
> care if anything smaller than that isn't quite exact.
> 
> But I get the impression that the folks who want rationals
> in Python want them precisely because they're *always*
> exact. If you couldn't rely on them to always be exact,
> it would defeat the purpose.

For that, I propose maxdenom=None to let the rationals
grow without bound.


Raymond Hettinger




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4