> But those feelings are no proof of anything. How do we get the > confirmation that using rationals in Python would be easy going and > innocuous in practice, beforehand? By adding them to the language but as an isolated type. The right conversions should happen when you mix rationals with other types of numbers (int/long -> rational -> float -> complex), but no operations should return rationals unless a rational goes in. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4