On vrijdag, nov 29, 2002, at 17:11 Europe/Amsterdam, Jack Jansen wrote: > I grabbed it from the old discussion, so there's a good chance MAL > came up with > it at that time. But Guido mumbled somthing about "k1"=="B" and > "k2"=="H" > and that being overkill, and then the discussion stopped. Hence my > question: > is k1/k2/k4/k8 what it's going to be? Cycling home I realized that this is may interfere with another plan I have: release an addon MacPython-OSX distribution for Apple's /usr/bin/python. This would basically be a distribution of the stuff in the 2.3 Mac subtree, which would graft itself on Apple's Python 2.2. At the moment this is possible, as the 2.3 Mac subtree is compatible with a 2.2 core. And MacPython-OSX 2.2+ is important to me, as it is part of my strategy for World Domination (by Python, not by me:-). Mark, do you still distribute PythonWin for multiple base Python versions? Would using new PyArg_ParseTuple format specifiers interfere with that? If not, how would you solve it? -- - Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> http://www.cwi.nl/~jack - - If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman -
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4