Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> writes:
> Michael> There's a buglet in my assignable __bases__ code that can (in
> Michael> pretty obscure situations) lead to Python code getting executed
> Michael> with an exception pending. I have a fix, but I'd like a test
> Michael> -- can anyone think of a way of testing for this?
>
> If it's too hard to implement in Python code, why not add something to
> Modules/_testcapimodule.c?
That would be harder, I think...
[Guido]
> I think you're talking about the code near the end of
> type_set_bases(). I still don't understand why you can'y just bail
> out?
I'm going to. But I'd still like a test against the old behaviour.
It's not a big deal.
Cheers,
M.
--
I don't have any special knowledge of all this. In fact, I made all
the above up, in the hope that it corresponds to reality.
-- Mark Carroll, ucam.chat
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4