Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030446.html below:

[Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Just van Rossum wrote:

> I agree. Also: whatever the value is, it can't be any more meaningful than any
> other, as I don't think the value has _any_ meaning in this context ;-)

if the value has no meaning, why not use a set?  how many ways
do we need to do the same thing?

</F>

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Currently baking idea for dict.sequpdate(iterable, value=True)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4