> > x = {}.sequpdate(...)
> >
> > which suggests that you're really looking for a different constructor
> > as a class method.
>
> Yes!
>
> Will revise the patch accordingly
> and use Just's suggested name, fromseq().
>
> Do you prefer the default value to be None or True?
> Earlier discussions on python-dev showed that
> True is more meaningful to some in the context of
> membership testing. OTOH, dict.setvalue and
> dict.get both use None.
I think it should be None -- let's be explicit when we want True.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4