> x = {}.sequpdate(...)
>
> which suggests that you're really looking for a different constructor
> as a class method.
Yes!
Will revise the patch accordingly
and use Just's suggested name, fromseq().
Do you prefer the default value to be None or True?
Earlier discussions on python-dev showed that
True is more meaningful to some in the context of
membership testing. OTOH, dict.setvalue and
dict.get both use None.
Raymond Hettinger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4