A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/030246.html below:

can modulefinder.py move to the library?

[Python-Dev] Plea: can modulefinder.py move to the library? [Python-Dev] Plea: can modulefinder.py move to the library?Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:54:56 -0500
> Documentation: Ok, that'll need to been done.
> 
> Regarding the print statements: most are in ModuleFinder.msg() and
> ModuleFinder.report(), and then there are two in
> _try_registry(). Apart from the latter, if msg() and reprot() are
> not appropriate for an application, they can easily be overridden.
> 
> But: by default, self.debug is set to zero, which means that no
> msg's are ever printed. I think the module as is is just fine (apart
> perhaps from the _try_registry print statements), it's a meta tool
> after all. If you don't agree: how should it be changed
> specifically?

Ok, make it so!

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4