gvanrossum@projects.sourceforge.net wrote: > *** NEWS 18 Nov 2002 16:19:39 -0000 1.526 > --- NEWS 18 Nov 2002 16:27:16 -0000 1.527 > *************** > *** 694,698 **** > - PyNumber_Check() now returns true for string and unicode objects. > This is a result of these types having a partially defined > ! tp_as_number slot. > > - The string object's layout has changed: the pointer member > --- 694,700 ---- > - PyNumber_Check() now returns true for string and unicode objects. > This is a result of these types having a partially defined > ! tp_as_number slot. (This is not a feature, but an indication that > ! PyNumber_check() is not very useful to determine numeric behavior. > ! It may be deprecated.) Perhaps PyNumber_Check() should check that at least one of nb_int, nb_long, nb_float is available (in addition to the tp_as_number slot) ?! -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH _______________________________________________________________________ eGenix.com -- Makers of the Python mx Extensions: mxDateTime,mxODBC,... Python Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4