On Thursday 14 November 2002 01:18 am, David Ascher wrote: > David Abrahams wrote: > >-1 on optlib (sounds like optimization) > > Agreed, especially with the parenthetical comment. > > I don't like argvparse much because this "argv" thing is far from > obvious to newbies. But given those two choices, I'd pick argvparse > over optlib. I was just about to say the same thing about "argv". How about calling it cmdoptionslib or optionslib. For a newbie just using the word "options" makes it diffcult to locate references using google, etc. On google optionlib had three pages of hits, optionslib had two hits and cmdoptionslib had no hits.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4