At the moment I use ZIP archives for the OS/2 EMX port, but I don't use bdist_dumb - I remember trying to use it, but can't remember why I stopped trying. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew MacIntyre \ E-mail: andrew.macintyre@aba.gov.au Planning & Licensing Branch \ Tel: +61 2 6256 2812 Australian Broadcasting Authority \ Fax: +61 2 6253 3277 -> "These thoughts are mine alone!" <---------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: A.M. Kuchling [mailto:akuchlin@mems-exchange.org] > Sent: Thursday, 14 November 2002 9:31 AM > To: distutils-sig@python.org > Cc: python-dev@python.org > Subject: [Distutils] Killing off bdist_dumb > > > [CC'ed to python-dev, distutils-sig; followups to distutils-sig] > > In the commentary attached to bug #410541, I suggest removing the > bdist_dumb command, because no interesting platforms actually install > from zip files. > > Are there any platforms Python supports, such as Slackware, BeOS, > AtheOS, or whatever, where the convention is to do binary > installations from .zip files? Any objections to killing bdist_dumb? > > --amk > (www.amk.ca) > ROSALIND: My pride fell with my fortune. > -- _As You Like It_, I, ii > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4