Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes: > OK, but bdist_wininst feels fragile (especially when I see checkins of > a pile of binary gunk each time something has changed). Zip files are > a lowest common denominator. That was my impression also, but I regained trust when I understood that we actually do have the source for those binaries :-) see http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/python/distutils/misc/install.c?annotate=1.22 > Why do you want to lose bdist_dumb? I don't want to lose it, but I wouldn't mind losing it if it simplifies something. I guess that makes it +0. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4