Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> writes: > The responsible person seems to be against a solution like this. But, in > the discussion it turns out that you are right and there some bugs in > FreeBSD's unistd.h. The fixes will (probably) committed today. But > there are some issues left mostly in the RPC and socket code, which need > __BSD_VISIBLE. Please be as precise as possible when talking about this stuff. What issues precisely? I'm not going to accept patches for platform-specific changes just because a user said that these changes are needed "to make it work". Instead, I want to record the *precise* cause that triggered these changes, so that others can re-evaluate whether they are still needed five years from now. > Some problems are left, because some functions (like ftello) are > only defined at a higher POSIX level. Why is that a problem? > > > > Only if all other options have been exhausted. What problems occur if > > > > _XOPEN_SOURCE is defined? > > > _XOPEN_SOURCE sets _POSIX_C_SOURCE. > > > > And why is that a problem? > In that case __BSD_VISIBLE is not set. And why is that a problem? This is exhausting. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4