Frank Horowitz <frank.horowitz@csiro.au>: > I know it's probably too late in the development cycle to get any > meaningful continuous set operations supported, but is there any hope of > renaming the implementation to something along the lines of "dsets" to > remind the user of the discreteness? (Am I being too pedantic?) You're being too pedantic. Even most mathematicians tend to assume a "set" will be drawn from a finite or discretely-infinite universe unless the specific context points at a nondenumerable one. Most mathematicians (other than metamathematicians) would be more likely to think of a continuous subset of the reals as an `interval'. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4