Gustavo Niemeyer <niemeyer@conectiva.com> writes: > > -0. Complicates the code and the docs and the mental model to save what, 3 > > measly characters of typing (e.g., "[x]")? > > Tim, I've submited to patch #549037 a possible implementation of the > singlesection algorithm I described in my last mail. If possible, could > you please verify if it's simple enough to change your mind? I doubt that. With no proposed documentation change, it is hard to evaluate whether the doc changes are simple. There is no way to get rid of the complication in the mental model. For the code changes: shouldn't there be a change to .write also? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4