Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-November/029862.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP270 (list.uniq())

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP270 (list.uniq())
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP270 (list.uniq())
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jason petrone wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 05:29:20PM +0000, Padraig Brady wrote:
>=20
>>So uniq really is a set operation and if Python had
>>a set builtin type then I'm not sure a uniq method
>>would be required?=20
>>could do:
>=20
> Yes, sets are a much better solution to this problem.  For that reason,
> my PEP wasn't accepted. =20

Well can it be removed from the list of Open PEPs?

> In the meantime, I just use dictionaries with None for values to achiev=
e=20
> the same goal.

Or sets.py (in 2.3)

thanks,
P=E1draig.

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP270 (list.uniq())
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP270 (list.uniq())
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4