> Whu not > > isgraph() --> is_visible() > iscntrl() --> is_control() > isprint() --> is_printable() > > so "is" is more... visible? Please no -- we already have islower() etc. without the _. (And _ is a pain to type.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4