> > These "use cases" > > don't convince me that there's a legitimate use case for > > string.letters etc. that the methods don't cover. > > This is funny. In the C++ community there's a nearly unanimous > consensus that way too much of the functionality of the standard > strings is expressed as member functions. Interesting. Python used to have the same attitude, hence the string module -- but the existence of multiple string types made methods more attractive. What's the alternative proposed for C++? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4