> From: Guido van Rossum [mailto:guido@python.org]=20 [snip] > > We're standardizing on 2.2.1, and unless there is a=20 > > pressing business need, we'll probably stay with=20 > > that version for the next 18-24 months. >=20 > Would you consider upgrading to 2.2.2 when it comes out, and=20 > subsequent bugfix releases? The goal for those releases is=20 > to make the upgrade 100% painless. We would probably consider it. What it comes down to is whether the new release is binary compatible (which I'm assuming it is), and if it included a bugfix that we found prudent to incorporate.=20 Don't misunderstand me, it's not that we don't want to update -- the developers here would probably be quite happy to work on the latest and greatest -- updating just inherently takes time (money) and it's not very exciting work. We'd just rather spend our time on something that has a more direct revenue source :-) Thanks for answering my question about true division. Sincerely, Bjorn Pettersen NAREX Inc. 303.526.4000 ext. 312 303.526.5130 fax www.narex.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4