> Note: there's an patch available at http://python.org/sf/561928 Thanks! I agree with the name change to PendingDeprecationWarning. Check it in before I change my mind! :-) > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > I think we can do two things. Either we can keep the docs for > > deprecated features but clearly mark the chapter or section with a > > deprecation note at the start, in bold. > > > > Or we can remove the docs for deprecated features, and add a chapter > > "deprecated features" which mentions each deprecated feature without > > describing it in detail, and provides information about what to use > > instead. > > Either of these approaches works for me. I personally like the second version better -- by not providing full documentation, it discourages new users more strongly from using deprecated features. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4