> There are a few more: 4.28 & 4.93 seem like they should be merged. > Both talk about compiling Python applications to a stand-alone program. I merged these into 4.28 and deleted 4.93. (Remember, the convention for deleting FAQ entries is to set the title to "Deleted" and remove all contents, except perhaps a pointer.) > Also, I updated 4.2, which should be reviewed to make sure it's > accurate? The title is: Can I create an object class with some > methods implemented in C and others in Python (e.g. through > inheritance)? (Also phrased as: Can I use a built-in type as base > class?) Looks OK to me, except that the ExtensionClass paper is no longer online at digicool.com. Google found a copy for me though: http://debian.acm.ndsu.nodak.edu/doc/python-extclass/ExtensionClass.html I've fixed that (adding a plug for Zope and explaining that ExtensionClass will go away in Zope 3). --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4