Guido van Rossum wrote: > Many test modules fail because they use Unicode literals. It's easy > enough to skip Unicode-related tests (just test for the existence of > 'unicode'), but it's hard to avoid having Unicode literals in the text > at all. Should we perhaps silently interpret Unicode literals as > regular string literals when compiling without Unicode support? That would be like silently truncating floats to integers. It works as long as x == int(x), but doesn't for fractional values. -0 if you make sure that the literal is plain ASCII. -1 if you don't. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg CEO eGenix.com Software GmbH ______________________________________________________________________ Company & Consulting: http://www.egenix.com/ Python Software: http://www.egenix.com/files/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4