>> We could rename string to basestring? > Or (more seriously than my last suggestion): strings Less than half joking, but the amount by which it's less may be negative: the new "string" is an abstract base class, which is pretty much the same as an interface. So call it istring now, and people will be subtly conditioned to accept interfaces when they're introduced for real <0.5+-epsilon wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4