Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I think that "new" might be the place where the type objects are > > exposed; > > Except its name is wrong. this may be the road to all evil, but ... couldn't it be 'type.int' or 'type.UnboundMethod' ? it looks so nicely explicit and short and of course 'type.type==type' holds :-) holger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4