> It follows: *every* argument is flawed because the basis of the > argument might change or be deprecated :-) I agree to > Kevin that deprecating the 'cold way' is not nice. Nobody suggested the module would be removed instantly (which I presume you mean by "deprecating the 'cold way'" -- otherwise I don't understand what you mean by that). Please read the documentation on the deprecation process (PEP 4 and 5, and to some extent PEP 230) before making assumptions. > Moreover, I don't think that 'use the builtins' is > a brilliant idea. Even in the standard lib more than *80* modules use > the name 'list' for their own purposes. People just don't > associate 'list', 'dict', 'str' etc. with types but use it in every > day live as a convenient name. Most of these have been built-in functions for a very long time, so the naming conflict has always been an issue. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4