>> If that's the case, I suggest you deprecate the types module and >> change its documentation to reflect the new preferred way of doing >> business. Guido> Quit harping about the fact that types isn't deprecated already! Guido> We haven't even done a release yet. I'm not. You were the one who brought up maybe deprecating it. If it's not going to be deprecated I see no reason it should not provide names for all the builtin types. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4