Martin v. Loewis wrote: > holger krekel <pyth@devel.trillke.net> writes: > > > if-it's-not-a-bug-don't-fix-it-ly yours, Holger > > Tell that the submitters of the 50 or so patches for Python which > don't fix bugs, but add features. Perhaps you can talk some of them > into withdrawing their patch... For an appropriate definition of 'bug' they fix a bug. Seriously, even implementations of PEPs fix a bug in that the current behaviour is not how it *should* be. I guess the problem is that what some people think what *should* be in python is not what the core developers (or GvR at last) thinks. That's fine! The issue/feature/bug/patch should be rejected or at least deferred then. Why are the 50 or so patches still in the queue? holger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4