On Wed, 22 May 2002, Gordon McMillan wrote: > On 22 May 2002 at 10:14, Michael Hudson wrote: > > > 2) Not having this lunatic distinction between > > patches and bugs ... > > They seem distinct to me, but maybe I'm > a bit old-fashioned :-). What artificial > distinction do you find irksome? Well, I think it's the way bugs sometimes have patches attached to them, or sometimes a patch gets put in the patch tracker and a link to it posted in the bug tracker. I guess there is a distinction, but it's too high up on sf. You can't get a list of all issues assigned to one developer, for instance, or the fact that the "groups" field for the various trackers has diverged over much. I really could have done with a "2.2.1 issues" view -- instead I had to ping back and forth between bugs and patches. Etc. Does that explain my grievance? I can try harder if you want. Cheers, M.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4