Guido, On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:43:49AM -0400, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > OK, but that makes planning by patch submitters more challenging. > > [snip] > I'd rather slip a schedule than release shoddy work. Sorry for being unclear, but you misunderstood me. I completely agree with the above. My point was not having a (proposed) deadline makes me feel that I have to drop everything in order a guarantee submitting a patch "on time." You have already indicated that you would not necessarily wait for Cygwin patches. I would rather have clearly stated deadlines that are subject to change (i.e., slippage). In this way, volunteers can better plan their time. Can I play with my daughter now or should I submit a patch? Can I go to sleep now or should I submit a patch? Etc. Jason
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4