[Barry] > > I'd much rather see a patch that just changed zip() to be an iterator > > instead of adding an iterzip(). [Greg E] > Wouldn't it be better as a lazy sequence a la xrange() > that produces an iterator, rather than being an > iterator itself? No, lazy sequences are a thing from the past, trying to do what iterators are for. (And yes, I know that a lazy sequence has different semantics.) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4