A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/022037.html below:

[Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory API

[Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory API [Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory APIGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Sun, 31 Mar 2002 17:27:23 -0500
> > Do we need to bump the API version after these changes?
> 
> Why?  The API version is for the source API, not the binary API, right?

No, it's for the binary API.  There's a test in Py_InitModule() that
checks whether a dynamically loaded extension uses the same API as the
core, and that's definitely a binary compatibility issue.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4