Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-March/022034.html below:

[Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory API

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory API
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory API
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Neil Schemenauer <nas@python.ca> writes:
> 
> > We deprecate the PyMem_* functions.  There's no need for them, IMHO:
> 
> -1. The rationale behind the function spellings is, as Tim explains,
> cross-version compatibility. 

What kind of cross-version compatibility are you referring to?

> Do we need to bump the API version after these changes?

Why?  The API version is for the source API, not the binary API, right?

  Neil

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory API
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Moving forward on the object memory API
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4